In short, the law of applicability of the non-competition rules evolves in Kentucky. If your company has not checked its non-compete agreements with a lawyer or if you are concerned about the applicability of your company`s non-competition rules, the lawyers at Commonwealth Counsel Group are happy to talk to you. While Creech likely raised more questions than he answered — questions that must be settled by the courts — one conclusion of the case is clear: Kentucky employers can no longer rely on maintaining employment, which is alone to support their competition bans. Competition bans in Kentucky. Non-competition rules are generally not favoured by the courts. In fact, some states, such as California, have passed laws that effectively prohibit the use of non-compete rules. Then, the employer must offer the worker a benefit in exchange for a promise not to compete. A job offer conditional on the adoption of a non-competition clause probably fulfils this condition, because the worker receives a benefit in the job offer in exchange for the promise not to compete. For staff recruited before the implementation of a non-competition policy, promotions or salary increases may qualify for a benefit in exchange for their consent. Competition bans are not applicable in California, where a law prohibits them, except in very limited and rare cases, otherwise judges will not enforce former employees. However, California employers can use no-debauchery and confidentiality agreements to protect their trade secrets, customer lists, and confidential data from disclosure when employees leave with access. (2) whether the non-competition clause is part of a larger employment contract which lays down other conditions of employment and employment; Where a worker has access to the employer`s trade secrets, whether by voluntary dismissal or involuntary dismissal, this information could accompany the former worker at the expense of the former employer.
. . .